
Reformation
in SA

- land reform 
Connections

- links
- search engine

STAFF
: E-MAILS

|

|
Nkuzi
on DLA's and LRAD
According
to the Ministry, the Integrated Programme "reflects
consultative processes between the Departments of Agriculture
and Land Affairs; between the Departments of Agriculture
and Land Affairs and Provincial Departments of Agriculture;
and between Government and key stakeholders" (p.1).
This statement is misleading on a number or points. The
latest policy appears to have emerged from a prolonged struggle
between the Department of Land Affairs and the Department
of Agriculture, now nominally united under a single minister.
Since the Minister's Policy Statement of February 2000,
DLA staff have been developing draft policy documents around
issues such as commercial black farmers, the food safety
net, farm equity schemes and municipal commonage. Simultaneously,
the Department of Agriculture has been preparing what it
calls an Integrated Programme of Land Redistribution and
Agricultural Development, in which the Food Safety-Net is
presented as merely the low end of the grant designed for
commercial farmers (requiring a minimum R5 000 own contribution
per household), municipal commonage is eliminated and assistance
for land for settlement purposes is explicitly excluded.
There has been inadequate consultation with rural communities
and NGOs involved in land and agricultural matters, and
the resulting proposals show no signs of being influenced
by any of the stakeholders involved in land reform in South
Africa.
Close
inspection of the new Programme reveals that it is closely
modelled on the World Banks recent land reform experiments
in Brazil and Columbia. The South American experiments are
themselves very recent, allowing little opportunity to assess
their success. Conditions in Brazil and Columbia diverge
greatly from those in South Africa, both in terms of the
nature of land demand and the nature of land reform applicants.
The South American experience is centred on delivering land
for commercial farming, and is clearly targeted at those
with significant resources at their disposal. Applicants
are presumed to be able, from their own pockets, to engage
the services of planning agents to assist them file applications.
This is a most unlikely scenario among the hundreds of thousands
of poor rural households in South Africa, many of whom do
not currently aspire to becoming commercial farmers.
|
|
|
|
|
|


|